Monthly Archives: September 2005

ExifTool by Phil Harvey

ExifTool by Phil Harvey: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/

I’ve been playing around with this tool for a while, mainly using it to add IPTC tags to images so that Photoshop can read the entries, but recently I tried it on some 350D .CR2 RAW files, and was stunned to find that not only did it add in the tags, but the rest of the file was unharmed by this activity.

After messing around with DPP (see older post) I discovered that version 5.63 would throw away the DPP recipe data already in a file when adding tags. I posted to the forum, and within 5 hours I got to test out a pre-release 5.64 which totally solved the problem.

Now that’s service.

So, whilst I’m on a roll: does anyone know of a Spotlight plugin for OS X that will index the metadata within a RAW file ? I’m pretty sure Automator can take care of adding in the tags after I import the files (or I’ll run an AppleScript via Image Capture) so once Spotlight gets hold of the IPTC info everything iPhoto does can be implemented with a handful of Finder Smart Folders.

Nice.

Share

Canon Digital Photo Professional

Digital Photo Professional: http://www.photoworkshop.com/canon/dpp/

Until tonight I hadn’t paid much attention to this application as I’d mainly been sulking at the lack of EOS 350D support in iPhoto. I’m still not sure why I looked at it again but it’s actually a very well thought out program with features that are totally complimentary to Photoshop Elements and Adobe Camera Raw which had been my previous point of reference.

I prefer to shoot in RAW mode and Adobe RGB colour space when at all possible: ACR does a good job even on the cheap PSE3 in terms of allowing images to be post-processed to avoid burnout, and over 90% of the images I’ve shot so far have worked fine with ACR3 set to Automatic. I have been a little worried about this though, as I’m at the mercy of what ACR thinks Auto ought to be, and that can change with the version. I can’t be certain that ACR7 would think the same, and there’s no easy way to note the changes applied to the RAW file to generate the starting PSD and to be fair, there is no easy way to record the settings in manual mode either.

This is where DPP really shines: if you can stick the too-short video tutorials (written with so much marketing speak and narrated soooo sloooowly watching them feels like my brain is being scooped out with a spoon) there’s some really good information in there. Any edits carried out do not alter the RAW file: each edit (and yes, this appears to include both cropping (called Trim) and cloning (called Stamp) as well as all the usual colour, contrast and curves tweaks is thrown into a Recipe which is attached to the RAW file and can also be applied in bulk to any other image. A huge plus point for Elements users is that it’s now possible to not only use Curves (a PS CS/CS2 only feature) but to use them in 16-bit colour space and then batch apply them (again, a PS CS/CS2 only feature) and it also appears from the demo that multiple applications of a recipe are handled intelligently and do not multiply the effect.

The Curves palette also has an interesting control system: I’m used to balancing levels with a White, Grey and Black point system in PSE3, but DPP opts for a four edge system, where Black is on the left, White is on the right, and there is no direct Grey equivalent. The bottom and top edges can be pulled in to restrict the depth (and height) of the values, and choosing the four curve “Luminance R, G, B” option in the Preferences and dragging the top edge too far down creates some stunning special effects that are reminiscent of negative Fill Light in Sigma‘s Photo Pro software, although DPP takes the concept of a single custom X3F one step further and allows individual recipes to be saved as standalone files, whilst giving an iconic representation of the current alterations applied to a RAW file in the thumbnail view and attaching those settings to the CR2 file (just as the X3F in SPP).

I’ve yet to try some stock RAW conversion tests to see how well DPP fares against ACR (and dcraw just for completeness) but unless it manages to be very bad I think I’ll stick with DPP for a while, and keep my changes inside the RAW file.

Edit: from comments on an earlier version it looks like PSE3 would still be the best bet for sharpening, and (of course) anything that involves masking or multiple RAW ‘exposures’ to bring back images with a large dynamic range.

Share

tv shows in programming languages

In Forth, nip tuck could also be described as swap drop dup -rot

Which is why Forth programmers should never get to come up with names for TV shows.

Share

Copy Your Digital Photos Onto Film – PhotographyBLOG

Copy Your Digital Photos Onto Film – PhotographyBLOG: http://www.photographyblog.com/index.php/weblog/comments/copy_your_digital_photos_onto_film/

Not as retrograde as some of the commenters might like to think: at least properly stored film has a proven real life of over 100 years, which is more than can be said for ‘accelerated aging’ lifetime figures from over-enthusiastic marketing departments who think that UV is the only ageing process (ie: ignoring CD/DVD substrate eating mould).

Share

Crave privacy? New tech knocks out digital cameras | CNET News.com

Crave privacy? New tech knocks out digital cameras | CNET News.com: http://news.com.com/Crave privacy New tech knocks out digital cameras/2100-7337_3-5869832.html?part=rss&tag=5869832&subj=news

Now this is a fascinating system – pretty much a exploit in terms of the method it uses to prevent the photographs, and easily bypassed by analogue cameras but that’s not the point: camera phones are (I would assume) the main target and without some large changes aren’t going to be immune from this any time soon.

A good thing ? Well, given the range I think it is: it’s so localised that no legitimate photography should be blocked, although I wonder if it means that all live concert photography will have to be a) from the wings or b) go back to film.

Share

LOW MORALE ::: Presents Radiohead Music Video – CREEP

LOW MORALE ::: Presents Radiohead Music Video – CREEP: http://www.lowmorale.co.uk/creep/

Wow.

Wow.

Wow.

Now that animation was so well conceived and executed it actually made me forget that it was Flash, and totally blew away more recent work I’ve seen on TV in odd spots (mainly BBC3 and C4) – it was back to the days when bizarre Canadian stuff made its way onto a regular BBC2 spot, back when BBC2 was the place you went to get away from sports coverage…

Of course, I’m now going to have to go and devour the entire web site in some Flash based frenzy of discovery, but my CPU fan has been idle for too long so it could probably use the exercise.

(apologies for anyone who came here from my email about the ‘post before last’ and has found it’s now the ‘post before the post before last’, but it was wandering through Marcus‘ archives and then messing about on Dan‘s site that did this.

So it’s your fault.

Thank you !)

Share

updated gallery

3 years and it’s still not quite right… Still, it’s better than before, and even has some more recent stuff but none of it has been retouched in quite the manner I want (no colour balancing, no careful cropping, no RAW highlight checking, no careful smoothing/sharpening, etc.), not to mention I’m falling out of love with the whole geographical nature of the albums.

However, the colours match those of this site a little better and I’ve got the hang of how the whole thing is set up (thanks to RapidWeaver) so it ought to be so little effort to keep it up-to-date when I do finally get some edits I’m happy with that they’ll actually make it off my drive and online. Probably starting next March or so. Maybe.

Anyway, new updates to the gallery will be left to the RSS feed on that site unless I’m very happy with the picture.

Share
Page 1 of 212